July 1, 2002
Observations And Predictions For The
Telecom Equipment Biz
What follows deals with all telecom equipment instead of just the Dallas
optical switching part of it.
Over the last several months, the industry's financial condition has
continued to deteriorate. Telecom news has become a bore, as its litany
of woes are just not really news anymore. They are about as predictable
as sunrise. There is no horse race or mystery in the progress of the
following logical four-step process:
-
Spending for telecom services goes down,
-
The RBOCs' and carriers' income goes down,
-
These companies cut personnel and equipment expenditures
in relation to
reduced income.
-
Equipment companies incomes go down and they cut personnel
and expenditures
in relation to reduced income.
You might as well play "beat the analyst" by recording your
own personal observations and predictions. The media seems to concentrate
primarily on repetitious layoffs and poor balance sheets of telecom
equipment firms. Analysts they have quoted the last couple of years
have not not done very well at forecasting. Granted, fortune telling
is tough for mere mortals, but I would like to compete with the analysts
for the fun of it and proclaim:
-
General business improvement is vital to any telecom
recovery. Mergers, buyouts,
3G wireless phones, new management, honest CEOs, etc. can't make a
huge
difference in recovery speed for telecom manufacturers. So, given
their declining
sales, more cuts are as normal as rain in monsoon season. The companies
can't print
money.
-
Bandwidth usage is growing enough right now that within
a couple of years data
communications could return an acceptable profit - and enough to restore
some
equipment vendor health.
-
The telecom biz that exists in three years will be
greatly changed. VOIP, MPLS, and
"more routers-less traditional switching" will gain an upper
hand. There will be fewer
major equipment vendors.
-
The industry will NOT dump standards big time to embrace
cheap innovative equipment
from startups that would like to ignore them. There may be additional
or changed
standards, but standards will remain a key factor in equipment sales.
That does not
mean that some vendors won't continue anti-competitive lawsuits against
standards
bodies. They just won't be able to really loosen the grip of standards,
perhaps just
swap them.
-
The public will accept less quality of service (QOS)
in exchange for continued cheap
phone service. Cell phones taught new generations to accept this.
Your home phone
service may not continue to be immensely better than your cell phone
as it is now in
most places. (Sure hope this is NOT the case, however.)
-
Ignore the talk implying how much sales in China are
benefiting US and European
companies. There may be huge sales there eventually, but the Chinese
have
proven themselves masters at KEEPING the money made in their country
IN their
country. Allowing profits to return home to companies investing billions
there is
definitely not a priority. Show me one firm that has brought out far
more money than
their costs. I have noticed in the last ten years that potential sales
in China keep growing
and the never really defined payoff date keeps slipping off into the
future.
- Much of the world production - and perhaps eventually even much of
the design
innovation - in telecom will move to China. As the leading world equipment
vendors
have been competing in attempts to modernize their Chinese industrial
base,
the Chinese have been learning much. The heavy presence of Asian companies
at
this year's poorly attended SuperComm should be a wake up call to Nortel,
Ciena,
Lucent and the other players. As with the crash of the telecom sales
boom, I knew
it was coming but underestimated its speed in arriving.
-
Ciena will be a much stronger power in telecom equipment
by the time a turnaround
in the market comes.
-
Cisco will have a much harder time hanging onto its
percentage of the router market. But
they are finally making some headway against traditional switching.
-
Without some major sales, cash infusion, or selling
off important company parts, it does not seem
like Nortel or Lucent can just keep trucking on for another year.
So it will be no surprise if a
major change in their operations is announced before then.. Suspect
this will most likely
occur when the $1.00/share delisting price is at hand. Wonder if Microsoft
might be planning on
getting into telecom at a bargain price by a purchase of one of these.
If they ARE thinking of this,
my guess is that Microsoft would:
-
Drop their strategy of "appeal and delay until
everyone has forgotten what the monopoly
charges were all about to begin with",
-
Accept whatever sanctions are imposed by Judge Judy,
-
Loudly complain that Microsoft will be mortally wounded
by the sanctions, and
-
Proceed to acquire a Nortel or Lucent and hope that
folks don't get too
alarmed by the monopolistic dangers of MS having simultaneous control
of phone/data
business, computer operating system design and a fair percentage of
personal
database information (Passport, etc.).
Of course, Ciena and Cisco may have enough money to buy a Nortel or
Lucent,
or Microsoft could just buy into/bail out either financially-weak firm
(or both) by purchasing
just 20% of their stock at at a time.
- I hope the WorldCom financial investigations do not spread down to
the equipment
vendors' sales practices. There could be a lot more crying if that onion
gets peeled,
but it's far too late to dig into this. The vendors are too near bankruptcy
and the
perpetrators are likely long unemployed if not lucky enough to have
escaped a bleak
near term sales future by leaving telecom.
- When equipment sales return and demand is ahead of delivery capacity
again, expect
to see some problems surface with the oft saluted, seldom questioned
idea of outsourcing
manufacturing. For any type of large surviving switches and other complex
gear with
many different types of circuit boards, separating the design engineers
from the plant
may prove counterproductive. For routers and such it will remain the
norm, but with the
complexity and hundreds of possible ways to mix and match components
in larger
systems, designers had best not need a plane ride to see how their ideas
are being
implemented on the line. Expensive problems with alpha and beta systems
will be early
warning signs. To avoid corporate admission that total outsourcing is
a mistake, engineering
groups may get larger mini-manufacturing capabilities for extensive
tests and wringing
out before full mfg. commitments are made. But the cost of these can
quickly balloon.
Went to a public Biotechnology meeting a couple of weeks ago in Dallas.
Discovered some Star Tech folks and other techies recently associated
more with telecom visiting there. They were there evidently seeking alternate
opportunities in biotech. The CEO of a small pharmaceutical company delivered
an excellent talk touching on the state of his industry. Unfortunately,
like telecom, it is currently experiencing some rather puny earnings.
From a contact I made at the meeting, I received an invitation for lunch
at the City Club in downtown Dallas. The 68th floor view from that posh
dining establishment was excellent, but I was not able to provide my host
with the "telecom turn around before 2004" prediction he was
hoping for.
Chuck Bealke
|